Reduce legal speed limit

How is the evidence assessed?

Source countries

Key messages

  • One study evaluated the effects on mammals of reducing the legal speed limit. This study was in Canada.

COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)

POPULATION RESPONSE (1 STUDY)

BEHAVIOUR (0 STUDIES)

About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

  1. A controlled, before-and-after study in 1983–1998 along a highway in Alberta, Canada (Bertwistle 1999) found that speed limit reductions and enforcement did not reduce vehicle collisions with bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis or elk Cervus canadensis. Sheep collision rates were similar in the reduced speed zones after limits were reduced (10.4 collisions/year) compared to before (10.3/year). Concurrently, in control areas where the speed limit was not reduced, there were fewer collisions in this second period (2.5 collisions/year) than the first period (3.4/year). Elk collisions increased with the speed limit reduction (after: 9.6/year; before: 7.8/year) but increased by more in the control zone (after: 14.3/year; before: 7.8/year). The local elk population increased 178% during the study. In 1991, the speed limit along a rural two-lane highway was reduced from 90 km/h to 70 km/h on three road sections (2.5, 4.0 and 9.0 km long). Monitoring in 1995 indicated that <20% of vehicles obeyed the 70 km/h limit. On average, 5,475 speeding tickets were issued/year. Animal-vehicle collisions were monitored for eight years before and eight years after speed limits were reduced, on three 2–3-km-long road sections for sheep and one 30-km-long section for elk. Vehicle speeds were monitored along two road sections in 1995.

    Study and other actions tested
Please cite as:

Littlewood, N.A., Rocha, R., Smith, R.K., Martin, P.A., Lockhart, S.L., Schoonover, R.F., Wilman, E., Bladon, A.J., Sainsbury, K.A., Pimm S. and Sutherland, W.J. (2020) Terrestrial Mammal Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions for terrestrial mammals excluding bats and primates. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust