Designate a Marine Protected Area without setting management measures, usage restrictions, or enforcement
Overall effectiveness category No evidence found (no assessment)
Number of studies: 0
Background information and definitions
Fishing can impact subtidal benthic invertebrates through species removal or habitat damage from fishing gear entering in contact with the seabed (Collie et al. 2000). Specific areas can be designated as protected, but often these are set without any clear management measures or usage restrictions in place, or enough enforcement (Guidetti et al. 2008). Inside such protected areas, it is unclear which activities and pressures are taking place, and if subtidal benthic invertebrates are able to naturally recover. While such areas, often referred to as “paper parks” (Rife et al. 2013), do exist, they are not recommended by the scientific community, and it is advised to always set clear management plans, objectives, and enforcement for marine protected areas (Di Minin & Toivonen 2015; Jones & De Santo 2016; Rife et al. 2013).
Collie J.S., Hall S.J., Kaiser M.J. & Poiner I.R. (2000) A quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf‐sea benthos. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 785–798.
Di Minin E. & Toivonen T. (2015) Global protected area expansion: creating more than paper parks. BioScience, 65, 637–638.
Guidetti P., Milazzo M., Bussotti S., Molinari A., Murenu M., Pais A., Spano N., Balzano R., Agardy T., Boero F. & Carrada G. (2008) Italian marine reserve effectiveness: does enforcement matter? Biological Conservation, 141, 699–709.
Jones P.J. & De Santo E.M. (2016) Viewpoint–Is the race for remote, very large marine protected areas (VLMPAs) taking us down the wrong track? Marine Policy, 73, 231–234.
Rife A.N., Erisman B., Sanchez A. & Aburto‐Oropeza O. (2013) When good intentions are not enough… Insights on networks of “paper park” marine protected areas. Conservation Letters, 6, 200–212.