Compensate farmers for produce loss caused by primates
Overall effectiveness category No evidence found (no assessment)
Number of studies: 0
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
Background information and definitions
Compensation schemes can be used to reduce the loss of income due to crop losses caused by primates. A study on wolves found that individual compensation appeared to have reduced the resentment of farmers to Canis lupus taking their livestock around Yellowstone National Park in the USA (Nyhus et al. 2003). The effectiveness of compensation schemes, however, is often undermined by difficulties in verifying claims by farmers (Mc Guinness & Taylor 2014).
Compensation schemes to cover the farmer’s costs to deter primates are discussed under ‘Pay farmers to cover the costs of strategies to deter primates that are not harmful to primates’.
Mc Guinness S. & Taylor D. (2014) Farmers’ perceptions and actions to decrease crop raiding by forest-dwelling primates around a Rwandan forest fragment. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 179–190.
Nyhus P., Fischer H., Madden F. & Osofsky S. (2003) Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: the challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conservation in Practice. 4, 37–40.
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:Primate Conservation
Primate Conservation - Published 2017