Study

Responses of chaparral and oak woodland plant communities to fuel-reduction thinning in southwestern Oregon

  • Published source details Perchemlides K.A., Muir P.S. & Hosten P.E. (2008) Responses of chaparral and oak woodland plant communities to fuel-reduction thinning in southwestern Oregon. Rangeland Ecology & Management (previously Journal of Range Management 1948-2004), 61, 98-109.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Thin trees within forests: effects on mature trees

Action Link
Forest Conservation

Thin trees within forests: effects on understory plants

Action Link
Forest Conservation
  1. Thin trees within forests: effects on mature trees

    A replicated, paired sites study in 2005 in Mediterranean type woodland in Oregon, USA (Perchemlides, Muir & Hosten 2008) found that thinning decreased woody canopy cover. Cover of trees and shrubs >0.3 m tall was higher in unthinned (97%) than thinned (25%) transects. Data was collected in 2005 using 30 pairs of thinned (for fuel reduction between May 1998 and June 2001) and unthinned transects (50 m). Tree cover was measured in five plots (3 m2) along each transect.

     

  2. Thin trees within forests: effects on understory plants

    A replicated, paired sites study in 2005 in Mediterranean type woodland in Oregon, USA (Perchemlides, Muir & Hosten 2008) found that thinning trees increased the cover of herbs and the number of regenerating shrubs. Cover of herbs (thinned: 103%; unthinned: 69%) and number of the shrubs sticky whiteleaf manzanita Arctostaphylos viscida and buckbrush Ceanothus cuneatus regenerations/transect (thinned: 1.7; unthinned: 0.3) were higher in thinned transects. Plant species richness/transect (thinned: 29; unthinned: 28) and diversity (Shannon's index thinned: 2.3; unthinned: 2.4), as well as number of regenerations/transect of oak Quercus spp. (thinned: 1.7; unthinned: 2.1) and conifer (thinned: <0.1; unthinned: <0.1) were similar in thinned and unthinned transects. Data was collected in 2005 using 30 pairs of thinned (thinned for fuel reduction between May 1998 and June 2001) and unthinned transects (50 m). Shrub cover was measured in five plots (3 m2) along each transect. Cover of herbs was measured in two quadrats (1000 cm2) within each plot.

     

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust